Legal Opinion

Suggs v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 1928No. 7 Div. 379PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

It • is undoubtedly a fact that the officers found a furnace and the component parts of a still in the woods in Talladega county, which when assembled would be a complete still and suitable for making whisky. It also appears that there were near the furnace two or three barrels of beer. The still was full of beer and there were “fire coals” in the furnace. This outfit was located in the woods, not on defendant’s land and about one and one-half miles from defendant’s house by the road. How far it was straight through does not appear.

There is no evidence, however, which would authorize a jury…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Hanson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Seigler v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Moody v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Martin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hereford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Higginbotham v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Eudy v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API