Legal Opinion

Moody v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1925No. 7 Div. 99PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The indictment was in two counts. The first charged a manufacture of whisky and the second the defendant possessed a still. When the evidence was all in, the court instructed the jury that there was not sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction under the first count, and so that count was eliminated, leaving a count charging a possession of the still. As to this count the evidence for the state tended to prove a still located on Chandler Mountain from eight to twelve miles from defendant’s home; that the officers, of whom there were several, saw the defendant with a gun within seven or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Seigler v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Farmer v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Knight v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Suggs v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Washington v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Bentley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Washington v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API