Guin v. State

In Clark v. State; 18 Ala. App. 217, 90 South. 16, this court said:

“The same rules of evidence apply in cases involving the violation of the prohibition laws in its several phases as it does in all other criminal eases, and there should be no differentiation in the application of these rules simply because the accused is charged with this character of offense.”

The ¿bove statement is pertinent to the case ■ at bar, for the transcript before us is absolutely devoid of any evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury or the judgment of guilt pronounced in this case; nor is there any evidence from…