Martin v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.
The evidence in this case, without conflict or dispute,. disclosed that several law enforcement and local officers searched for and found two stills in Lowndes county; and, while all parts of the stills were not located, the evidence of the witnesses was that the parts found were commonly or generally used for, or were suitable to be used in, the manufacture of prohibited liquors or beverages. The evidence met the required rule. Wilson v. State, 20 Ala. App. 62, 100 So. 914, and by this evidence the corpus delicti was established.
As to the connection of this appellant with the stills in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1924
- Guin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Hanson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
- Seigler v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- Suggs v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928
- Mancil v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933