Legal Opinion

Hereford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 18, 1992No. CR 91-922PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Tracey Maurice Hereford, was convicted of arson in the second degree and was sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment.

I

The prosecutor's comment in closing argument that he was "convinced of the degree of proof" does not constitute reversible error. Immediately after defense counsel's objection, the prosecutor stated that he "withdrew" the comment, and the trial court instructed the jury to the effect that it was the duty of the jury and not the attorneys to determine the sufficiency of the evidence. Carpenter v.State, 404 So.2d 89, 98 (Ala.Cr.App. 1980), cert. quashed,404 So.2d 100…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Whitt v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Carpenter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  4. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  5. McCoy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Land v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  2. Burgess v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  3. Patrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Whitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  5. Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API