Legal Opinion

Russell-Smith v. Water Resources Department

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 7, 1998No. PC 96-5; CA A95766PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Director of the Water Resources Department dismissing a proceeding to cancel the individual respondents’ water right on the basis of nonuse. ORS 540.610(1). The dispositive question is whether a holder of a water right who (1) takes water from the authorized source but (2) does so from an unauthorized point of diversion has “fail[ed] to use all or part of the water appropriated,” triggering forfeiture of the water right. ORS 540.610(1). The Director concluded that there was no forfeiture in those circumstances. We agree and affirm.

Except as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Williams v. AltnowOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Van Tassel Real Estate & Livestock Co. v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Graham v. LeekIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Whited v. CavinOregon Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fort Vannoy Irrigation District v. Water Resources CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Hannigan v. HintonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API