Hannigan v. Hinton
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.
Petitioners seek review of a final order of the Director of the Oregon Water Resources Department (the director) cancelling petitioners’ water rights on the basis of nonuse. Three questions are before us: (1) whether water rights for mining may be lost by forfeiture under ORS 540.610, or may be lost only by application of a common-law abandonment theory, as argued by petitioners; (2) whether use of water at a place different from that designated on the water rights certificate constitutes use that avoids forfeiture under ORS 540.610; and (3) whether substantial evidence supports the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Water Rights of Deschutes RiverOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Fisher Broadcasting, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Rencken v. YoungOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Squaw Creek Irrigation District v. MameroOregon Supreme Court · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Klamath Irr. Dist. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Scherzinger v. Portland Custodians Civil Service BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008