Legal Opinion

Van Tassel Real Estate & Livestock Co. v. City of Cheyenne

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1936No. 1912PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action by plaintiff to enjoin defendant The City of Cheyenne (which only needs to be men tioned among the defendants) from diverting water to which plaintiff claimed to be entitled, and to recover damages for wrongful diversion. The following facts appear:

The City of Cheyenne is a municipal corporation, located in southeastern Wyoming, was incorporated about 1877, and ever since that time has gradually grown until it had a population of about 17,000 people according to the census of 1930. Immediately northwest of the city is located what was formerly known as Fort D. A. Russell,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Re Determination of Water Rights of Hood River.Oregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. In Re Water Rights of Deschutes RiverOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Hall v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Wyoming Hereford Ranch v. Hammond Packing Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. TheodoratusWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. City & County of Denver v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  4. Campbell v. Wyoming Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Montana v. WyomingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API