Legal Opinion

McClean v. Bradley

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided April 1, 1922No. Nos. 581, 582PublishedCited by 15 opinions

In Equity. Consolidated suits by Samuel N. McClean and by E. A. Gardiner and others against M. A. Bradley and others.

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, District Judge

(sitting by designation). This consolidated action in equity is brought by certain stockholders of a defunct New Jersey corporation, known as the McClean Arms & Ordnance Company, to set aside a sale of its patents made to certain of its former directors, the defendants, and for an accounting for profits therefrom received.

The object of the corporation was the development and exploitation of the inventions of Dr. Samuel N. McClean, one of the plaintiffs, relating to machine guns. Some ten years’ time and several hundred thousand dollars were spent in this enterprise, which resulted in failure…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Johnston v. Standard Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. LaHue v. Keystone Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  2. Gow v. Consolidated Coppermines Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
  3. In Re the Unauthorized Practice of Law of EllisHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Watts v. VanderbiltCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  5. Costell v. Costell (In Re Costell)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API