Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Town of Bird Island

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 17, 1926No. 25,652PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Certiorari to review a decision of the State Industrial Commission denying a claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

The sole question is whether under the act, H. J. Rouse, accidentally killed in a gravel pit, was an employe of the town of Bird Island or an independent contractor. Some time previous to December, 1924, the town board determined to gravel 2-£ miles of a town road. An agreement with the owner of a gravel pit was made for the purchase of gravel. A pit boss and checker were employed, and word was passed that anyone could haul out gravel at certain rates per load of 1-| cubic…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Virginia & Rainy Lake Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Herron v. Coolsaet Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Van Simaeys v. George R. Cook Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Nesseth v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. Wade v. TRAXLER GRAVEL COMPANYMississippi Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Moore v. Kileen & GillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Judd v. Sanatorium Commission of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API