Legal Opinion

Van Simaeys v. George R. Cook Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1918No. Docket No. 26PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Albert Van Simaeys presented his claim for compensation against the George R. Cook Company for injuries sustained in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant and the Prudential Casualty Company, insurer, bring certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case is before us upon certiorari to the industrial accident board, which board allowed the claim of the applicant. The applicant had been working for the respondent George R. Cook Company, with his team of horses, doing general teaming work for about five months before his injury, and had been paid *541by the day. A few days prior to his injury, however, a new arrangement was made between the applicant and said respondent whereby the applicant, together with a number of other employees, agreed to haul a quantity of dirt to make a certain fill, at the rate of 65 cents, then later 75 cents…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gall v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Holbrook v. Olympia Hotel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Carleton v. Foundry & Machine Products Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Perham v. American Roofing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bristol & Gale Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Bentley v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Dennis v. Sinclair Lumber & Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Wight v. H. G. Christman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Rouse v. Town of Bird IslandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API