Legal Opinion

Watson v. City of Durham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 28, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

Tbe trial judge properly submitted the cause to the jury. He stated and arrayed the contentions of the parties with clearness and impartiality and correctly stated the principles of law applicable to the various phases of the evidence.

The defendant offered one of the guards as a witness, who was present at the time of the injury, and was asked what was the condition of the hammer plaintiff was using. He replied: “I would say it was in good condition.”

The plaintiff insists that the evidence was incompetent and should have been excluded by application of the rule heretofore announced in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bane v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Marshall v. . Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Etheridge v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. McCord v. . Harrison-Wright Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Bruce v. O'Neal Flying Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Powell v. DEIFELLS, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Cook v. HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API