Legal Opinion

Etheridge v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BeosdeN, J.(1) What duty does the law impose upon an employer with respect to furnishing particular tools or appliances to a workman in performing particular types of work?(2) Was the evidence of certain injuries sustained by the witness Keeter, competent?

This case is built upon the theory that it was the duty of the defendant in the exercise of ordinary care to furnish goggles to the plaintiff. The leading goggle cases in this State are: Whitt v. Rand, 187 N. C., 805, 123 S. E., 84; Jefferson v. Raleigh, 194 N. C., 479, 140 S. E., 76. The facts in Whitt v. Band, supra, are almost identical…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Whitt v. . RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Perry v. Kelford Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Broadway v. . GrimesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Conard v. . ShufordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Jefferson v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Enloe v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Henderson v. MunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  3. Karpf v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. CopelandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  5. Etheridge v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API