Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marshall v. . Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 27, 1921PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1DissentHoke, J.

J., concurring in the dissenting opinion. This is an action brought by the plaintiff, a minor, through his next friend, to recover damages for the loss of his arm and other injuries, resulting from the alleged negligence of the two defendants.

The plaintiff offered evidence tending to prove the following facts:

The plaintiff was nineteen years of age at the time of his injury in October, 1919. He was employed by the defendant, Interstate Telephone and Telegraph Company, in 1918 as general utility boy or apprentice lineman, at $2 per day, and had been climbing poles some four to six months prior…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Britt v. Carolina Northern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Summerlin v. Carolina & North-Western RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Hoyle v. City of HickorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Horne v. Consolidated Railway, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Snow Lumber Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. LindleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Kientz v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API