Kiewit/tulsa-Houston v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHER, Circuit Judge.
Kiewit/Tulsa-Houston, a joint venture (KTH), appeals from the judgment of the United States Claims Court, dated January 17, 1992, dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction seven of eight counts of KTH’s complaint. Kiewit/Tulsa-Houston v. United States, 25 Cl.Ct. 110 (1992). We affirm.
I
KTH was formed under the laws of Nebraska by written joint venture agreement between Kiewit Industrial Co. (Kiewit) and Tulsa-Houston, Inc. (Tulsa). The purpose of the joint venture, as stated in the agreement, was to bid on and to perform a contract for the construction of an oil…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The United States v. Grumman Aerospace CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Ball, Ball & Brosamer, Inc. And Ball & Brosamer (Jv) v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- The United States v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Universal Canvas, Inc. v. Michael P.W. Stone, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Kiewit/Tulsa-Houston v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
3Cited by9 opinions
- Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company v. Lawrence H. Garrett, Iii, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Janet M. Clark v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- PCI/RCI v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. Sean C. O'keefe, Acting Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- The Sadelmi Joint Venture v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.