United States v. Ronald Lester Parry
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRABER, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Ronald Lester Parry was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm after previously having been convicted for three serious drug offenses, possessing methamphetamine with the intent to distribute it, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime. He appeals his sentence on the ground that the district court erred by concluding that three of his prior convictions were predicate offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 924 of the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984 (“ACCA”). 1 We hold that Defendant’s pri- or convictions were correctly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. DiltsOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- United States v. Peter Santos MurilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- State v. LangdonOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- United States v. Thomas Stanko MarksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. AnkenyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Mendez-Mendez v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Jorge CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. MayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. CramptonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.