Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronald Lester Parry

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 14, 2007No. 05-30522PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRABER, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Ronald Lester Parry was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm after previously having been convicted for three serious drug offenses, possessing methamphetamine with the intent to distribute it, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking crime. He appeals his sentence on the ground that the district court erred by concluding that three of his prior convictions were predicate offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 924 of the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984 (“ACCA”). 1 We hold that Defendant’s pri- or convictions were correctly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. DiltsOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. United States v. Peter Santos MurilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. State v. LangdonOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. United States v. Thomas Stanko MarksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. AnkenyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Mendez-Mendez v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Jorge CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. MayerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. CramptonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API