Legal Opinion

Winston v. Williams & McKeithan Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 1947PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

The sole question here is as to the correctness of the action of the judge of Superior Court in overruling the demurrer to the complaint. In the light of appropriate procedure and applicable principles of law, we have opinion accordant with the ruling.

“The office of demurrer is to test the sufficiency of a pleading, admitting for the purpose the truth of the allegations of fact contained therein, and ordinarily relevant inferences of fact necessarily deducible therefrom are also admitted . . .” Ballinger v. Thomas, 195 N. C., 517, 142 S. E., 761. Both the statute, G. S., 1-151, and the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Coleman v. . WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Coleman v. WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Scott v. Statesville Plywood & Veneer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Fordham v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Eller v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API