Chandler v. . Cameron
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.
For convenience of narration, the defendant, H. C. Cameron, is hereinafter called Cameron, and the defendant, Eugene McLeod, is hereinafter designated as McLeod.
Standing trees are a part of the realty, and can be conveyed only by such an instrument as is sufficient to convey any other realty. Ward v. Gay, 137 N. C., 397, 49 S. E., 884; Drake v. Howell, 133 N. C., 163, 45 S. E., 539.
When be entered into the contract with McLeod, Cameron acquired the right as between himself and McLeod to compel McLeod to convey to him the undivided one-sixth interest in the timber in controversy which McLeod…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Turner v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Black v. Solano Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Combes v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Dorman v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Dorman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Carolina Beach Fishing Pier, Inc. v. Town of Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Morehead v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Smith v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Hill v. Pinelawn Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Lawing v. JaynesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.