Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Forrest

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1952No. 248PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEkviN, J.

The demurrer was rightly overruled even if the defendant’s thesis that the plaintiff cannot recover damages for mental suffering unaccompanied by physical injury be accepted as valid.

The essence of a trespass to realty is the disturbance of possession. In consequence, every unauthorized entry on land in the peaceable possession of another constitutes a trespass, without regard to the degree of force used and irrespective of whether actual damage is done. Lee v. Stewart, 218 N.C. 287, 10 S.E. 2d 804; Brame v. Clark, 148 N.C. 364, 62 S.E. 418, 19 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1033, 16 Ann. Cas. 73; Dougherty…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lamm v. ShingletonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Harris v. . SneedenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Hutton & Bourbonnais, Inc. v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. May v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Womack v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Ruark Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Food Lion, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  3. Dunbar Corp. v. LindseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  4. Miller v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. ChekanowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API