Legal Opinion
DAYNIGHT, LLC v. Mobilight, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided January 27, 2011No. 20091088-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORME, Judge:
T1 Appellants Daynight, LLC; KK Machinery Pty. Ltd.; and Paul LaMarr (collectively, KK Machinery) appeal the district court's decision to grant appellee Mobilight, Ine's motion for sanctions and the court's subsequent entry of default judgment against KK Machinery. KK Machinery also appeals the district court's ruling granting attorney fees and costs to Mobilight. We affirm.
I. Default Judgment
T2 At oral argument, KK Machinery conceded that it takes no issue with the district court's basic decision to impose sane-tions against it, but rather contends that the district court abused…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Metropolitan Opera Ass'n v. Local 100, Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International UnionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Kilpatrick v. Bullough Abatement, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
- Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- W. W. & W. B. Gardner, Inc. v. Park West Village, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ockey v. Club JamCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- First American Title Insurance v. Northwest Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Macris v. Sevea International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Diversified Concepts v. KofordCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Daynight, LLC v. Mobilight, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.