Legal Opinion

Kilpatrick v. Bullough Abatement, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2008No. 20060887, 20070156PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 These cases are two of several asbestos-related cases governed by a Case Management Order (the "CMO") that was adopted in 2001 and applies routinely to ail asbestos-related litigation brought by the firms involved in drafting the CMO. One of the "Additional Discovery" obligations imposed by the CMO was an autopsy following the death of any plaintiff. Margaret Kilpa-trick and Carolyn Kirkham (collectively, the "plaintiffs") both failed to procure an autopsy before their husbands were respectively cremated and buried. As a sanction for the violation of the CMO,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. PinderUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing Homeowners Ass'n v. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Daniels v. Gamma West Brachytherapy, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Taylor v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Energy Claims Ltd. v. Catalyst Investment Group Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 2014

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API