Legal Opinion

Diversified Concepts v. Koford

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 1, 2021No. 20191071-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

2021 UT App 71

THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS DIVERSIFIED CONCEPTS LLC; DARIN DYELL; AND LANDFORM DESIGN GROUP PC, Appellants, v. JILL KOFORD AND ROD KOFORD, Appellees. Opinion No. 20191071-CA Filed July 1, 2021 Second District Court, Ogden Department The Honorable Camille L. Neider No. 150903526 S. Spencer Brown and Jack D. Smart, Attorneys for Appellants Diversified Concepts LLC and Darin Dyell Brad M. Liddell, Attorney for Appellant Landform Design Group PC Matthew A. Bartlett and Matthew G. Koyle, Attorneys for Appellees JUDGE DAVID N. MORTENSEN authored this Opinion, in which JUDGES MICHELE M.…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  2. Mark N. Silvestri v. General Motors Corporation, Dfendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  3. Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  4. Eric Esher Schmid v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Eric SchmidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Lee v. Max Intern., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Toman Engineering Co. v. Koch ConstructionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Gallegos v. BrewskisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026
  3. Powertech Industrial Co., Ltd v. 360 Electrical, LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API