Legal Opinion
Ives v. Ellis
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Motion to increase amount of undertaking on attachment.
1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.
The action is for a breach of warranty with regard to certain books sold by defendants to the plaintiff. The *334defendants are, nonresidents, and plaintiff, - upon concededly proper and sufficient affidavits, obtained an attachment, and attached some books belonging to the defendants. The action was tried and resulted in a verdict for the defendants. An appeal was taken and the Appellate Division affirmed the judgment. The plaintiff then appealed to the Court of Appeals, where the case now rests. Ho motion has been made by defendants to vacate the attachment, as the attachment was regularly…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tyng v. American Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Fuerstenberg v. American Soda Fountain Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
3Cited by6 opinions
- Balinsky v. GrossAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
- M. J. Brandenstein & Co. v. CastanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
- Fixel v. TallmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
- Hotchner v. BarrymoreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940
- General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. R. C. Maxwell Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.