Legal Opinion

Hotchner v. Barrymore

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 5, 1940No. Civil No. 897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

Motion for an order vacating a warrant of attachment.

This action is upon a written express contract, for the 'defendant’s alleged breach of which the plaintiffs seek to recover judgment.

The cause was begun in the Supreme Court of this State (the venue being laid in the County of Queens), a copy of the summons and complaint having been accepted on January 29, 1940, at the office of the defendant’s attorneys in lieu of personal service; on the next day notice of appearance was duly served.

On or about February 6th, a warrant of attachment was duly issued by Mr. Justice…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Matter of TillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. In Re the Estate of MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Greenberg v. Jerome H. Remick & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Auerbach v. Internationale Wolfram Lampen Aktien GesellschaftDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910
  5. Dicks-David Co. v. Edward Maurer Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Levisohn, Lerner, Berger & Langsam v. Medical Taping Systems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. Allied Tire Sales, Inc. v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API