Legal Opinion

General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. R. C. Maxwell Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 1934Published

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $2,250 on an attachment undertaking given by the defendant R. C. Maxwell Company, on which the defendant National Surety Company was surety, in an action brought in the Supreme Court by R. C. Maxwell Company against this plaintiff. A warrant of attachment was issued in that action and the plaintiff’s property in New York and Kings counties, consisting of bank accounts, was attached. As a condition to discharging the levy under the attachment, the plaintiff paid $889 as premium on a bond and also paid $619 poundage to the sheriff of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ives v. EllisNew York Supreme Court · 1901
  2. M. J. Brandenstein & Co. v. CastanoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1922
  3. Fuerstenberg v. American Soda Fountain Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API