Legal Opinion

Fuerstenberg v. American Soda Fountain Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, The American Soda Fountain Company, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the - office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 17th day of August, 1897, as denied its motion .that the. plaintiff increase his security upon an attachment granted in the action.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Brunt, P. J.:

A warrant of attachment was issued in this case requiring the sheriff to attach the property of the defendant to the amount of *502$9,653 and interest, together with the costs and expenses. The undertaking upon the attachment was in the sum of $250. The property of the defendant was attached, and, for the purpose of discharging the attachment, the defendant filed an undertaking with the court to secure the amount of the plaintiff’s alleged claim, with interest and costs, which undertaking was duly approved by the judge granting the warrant of attachment, and an order was entered…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ives v. EllisNew York Supreme Court · 1901
  2. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. R. C. Maxwell Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  3. T. W. Warner Co. v. AndrewsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API