Balinsky v. Gross
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the City Court of the city of Hew York, entered upon a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. .
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
The plaintiff sues as assignor of the firm of Rivkin Bros., upon a hond in the usual form, executed hy t'he defendants upon an application for a warrant of attachment. It appears conclusively that Rivkin Bros, -were nonresidents of the State and had no place of business in the city of New York; that the writ of attachment and the papers upon which it was granted were sufficient on their face, and that they alleged that Rivkin Bros, were non-residents and had no place of business in the city of New York, thereby giving the plaintiff in the action the right to apply for an (attachment against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tyng v. . American Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Tyng v. American Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Tyng v. American Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Ives v. EllisNew York Supreme Court · 1901
- Fixel v. TallmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
3Cited by9 opinions
- McIntosh v. KnoxNevada Supreme Court · 1917
- Moseley v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1920
- St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. LoveUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- Allith-Prouty Co. v. WallaceWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Java Cocoanut Oil Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.