Shindledecker v. New Bethlehem Borough
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Hirt, J.,
Opinion by
The question in these appeals is whether four mem bers of a volunteer fire company were protected by the amending Act of May 11, 1925, P. L. 711, the legislation then in force, making a borough liable for compensation for accidental injury to members of its volunteer fire company within the definite limitations set forth in the act.
The facts are not in dispute. Decedent, the husband of Florence M. Slaugenhoup and the three other claimants were members of a volunteer fire company of the Borough of New Bethlehem. This company was associated with ten other like volunteer…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sames v. Borough of PerkasieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Barclay-Westmoreland Trust Co. v. Latrobe BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Sonnett v. Stowe Twp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- DeFelice v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Versellesi v. Elizabeth TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
3Cited by8 opinions
- MacY v. HeverinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Lees v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Mahoning Township SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Wittlinger v. Millersville BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- MacY v. HeverinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.