Legal Opinion

Lees v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1941No. Appeal, 151PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This workmen’s compensation death claim naturally excites one’s sympathy, but it is subject to the condition uniformly imposed in all such claims, viz, that compensation is payable only if the death of the employee accidentally occurred in the course of his employment.

By virtue of the provisions of the Act of June 4, 1937, P. L. 1552, claimant’s husband, Albert E. Lees, must be regarded as a limited or provisional employee ,of the Borough of Ferndale on October 12, 1938, the day of the fatal accident. He was a member of the Ferndale Volunteer Fire Company, and by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Paulin v. Williams Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Paulin v. Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. McDermott v. Sun Indemnity Co. of New YorkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Sames v. Borough of PerkasieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Barclay-Westmoreland Trust Co. v. Latrobe BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Town of Russell Volunteer Fire Department v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  2. Brinker v. GreensburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Mahoning Township SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Obrzut v. Olyphant BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Delahunty v. Lower Chichester TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API