Legal Opinion

Sames v. Borough of Perkasie

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1930No. Appeal 175PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion Br

Linn, J.,

This appeal by the compensation insurer of the borough of Perkasie also raises questions on the right of a member of a volunteer fire company to compensation, in circumstances in a legal sense, quite like those considered in Sonnett v. Stowe Township, 100 Pa. Superior Ct. 397. Appellant states three questions involved: 1. Was a fireman, fatally injured while riding on his company’s fire truck on the way to a fire drill, employed within the Act of May 14, 1925, P. L. 714? 2. In the circumstances shown in this record, was he “loaned” to another municipality? 3. Had the board…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Sgattone v. Mulholland & Gotwals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Tarr v. Hecla Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Byrne v. Henry A. Hitner's Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Persing v. Citizens Traction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Foster v. State College BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Nelson v. Borough of GreenvilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Lebeck v. William A. Jarvis, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Bronkowski v. Colonial Colliery Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Federal Insurance v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API