Legal Opinion
State v. Modern Recycling, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 11, 1997No. C5-96-1336PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
Respondent Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) issued an administrative penalty order (APO) against appellant Modem Recycling, Inc. Modern did not request an administrative hearing to challenge the APO, and the attorney general petitioned the district court to file the APO as a court order. Based on its conclusions that MPCA followed statutory procedures for issuing an APO and that appellant Roger DuPaul was personally liable to pay the penalty assessed against Modem, the district court ordered the entry of judgment against Modern and DuPaul in the amount of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Doe v. Minnesota State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- St. Paul Citizens for Human Rights v. City Council of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. WembleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Szarzynski v. SzarzynskiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Stephens v. Board of Regents of University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. BerriosCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- North Star Mutual Insurance Co v. Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.