State v. Schultz
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge. *
In challenging an order granting respondent’s petition for expungement of his felony assault conviction records, appellant argues that the district court abused its discretion in exercising its inherent authority to expunge. Alternatively, appellant argues that if any exercise of inherent authority was proper, such authority is limited to expungement of judicial records, and does not extend to records of the executive branch. Because the district court has broad discretion over all court records and agents of the court, we affirm its order to expunge all judicial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. LansdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Ex Parte ElliotTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' CompensationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. C. A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. AmbayeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lickiss v. Financial Industry Regulatory AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- State v. S.L.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- State v. H.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. L.W.J.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. N.G.K.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.