Legal Opinion
Lickiss v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 23, 2012No. A134179PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, J.
Appellant Edwin E. “Mike” Lickiss filed a petition in state court seeking to expunge his public securities brokerage records held within the central registration depository (CRD) database maintained by respondent Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). In that petition Lickiss cited the court’s jurisdiction under FINRA rule 2080(a) (mle 2080),1 as well *1128as the court’s equitable and inherent power to effect expungements. Sustaining FINRA’s demurrer without leave to amend and dismissing the matter, the trial court adopted the standard set forth in rule 2080(b)(1) to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Khoury v. Maly's of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Arce v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Hirshfield v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Cassinos v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ronay Family Limited Partnership v. TweedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Mahan v. Charles W. Chan Ins. Agency, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Orange Catholic Found. v. Arvizu, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Chen v. Berenjian, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Royal Alliance Associates, Inc. v. LiebhaberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.