Legal Opinion

State v. S.L.H.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 4, 2008No. A06-1750PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Justice.

Appellant S.L.H. filed a petition for ex-pungement of the criminal records related to her fifth-degree possession of a controlled substance conviction on the ground that expungement was necessary for her to achieve her employment goals. The district court granted S.L.H.’s petition as to her criminal records held by the judicial branch but denied her petition as to her criminal records held outside the judicial branch. The court of appeals affirmed the district court. Because we conclude that the district court did not err in declining to exercise inherent authority to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re Clerk of Lyon County Courts' CompensationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. State v. C. A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. AmbayeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. State v. R. L. F.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Barlow v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. M.L.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  2. In re the Welfare of J.J.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. State v. M.D.T.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. State v. R.H.B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API