Legal Opinion
Ey v. Office of the Chief Administrative Officer of the United States House of Representatives
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 10, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1733PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
The plaintiff Carl S. Ey initiated this employment discrimination suit, under the Congressional Accountability Act (“CAA”), 2 U.S.C. § 1301 et seq., against the defendant Office of the Chief Administrative Officer (“CAO” or “the defendant”) of the United States House of Representatives (“H.R.”), after the plaintiffs termination from his position as the H.R.’s Director of Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery. Am. Compl., ECF No. 3, at 2. The plaintiff alleges that he was wrongfully terminated based on “age, gender, and disability-based…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mokhtar v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Burton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Brady v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Duru v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Dickerson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.