Legal Opinion
Brady v. United States Capitol Police
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 8, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-1299PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge
The plaintiff, Officer Kristin Brady, brings this action against her employer, United States Capitol Police (“USCP” or “defendant”), pursuant to Section 207(a) of the Congressional Accountability Act (“CAA”), 2 U.S.C. § 1317(a), asserting a single claim for unlawful retaliation. Compl. ¶¶ 35-36. By her own admission, the plaintiff used foul language to relay sexually-graphic gossip to a co-worker, prompting the defendant’s Office of Professional Responsibility (“OPR”) to investigate and ultimately discipline the plaintiff. Id. ¶¶ 24-27, 32-33.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Townsend v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- McManus v. Tetra Tech Construction, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2017
- Carney v. Town of Weare, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017
- Dodson v. United States Capitol PoliceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Rogers v. Voltron Data, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.