Legal Opinion

Polk v. Bartlett

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 3, 1961No. 39007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, Justice.

Plaintiff, L. A. Bartlett, d/b/a Bartlett Electric Company, submitted a bid to W. E. Polk, d/b/a Polk Construction Company, defendant, which was accepted. The material portions of said bid reads as follows:

“We wish to submit our figure for the elementary school building, Shidler-Webb City School District, in accordance with the plans and specifications as drawn by W. H. Elliott, Jr. Architect.
“We propose to install the electrical equipment as specified, on a time and material basis not to exceed $8,000.00. All invoices submitted by our office on time and material will be…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lumbermen's Supply Co. v. NealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Gasper v. MayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Mead v. HellamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Swift v. McMurraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. McGill v. Cooper Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Askins Properties, L.L.C. v. Oklahoma County AssessorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  3. Altshuler v. MalloySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Harris v. SnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  5. Marten v. Credit Adjustment Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API