Legal Opinion

Lumbermen's Supply Co. v. Neal

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1941No. 30148PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.

Plaintiff, A. C. Neal, brought this action for an accounting against defendant, Lumbermen’s Supply Company, for 10 per cent of its net profits from May 1, 1939, to September 30, 1939, which by written contract it had agreed to pay him as part compensation for his services as sales manager. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

By written contract, and a supplementary letter, defendant employed plaintiff, who had theretofore been its general manager, as sales manager at a stated monthly salary and 10 per cent of its net earnings during the period of service. The net earnings were to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morrison v. WoodburySupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. v. LivelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Weleetka Light & Water Co. v. BurlesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Byars v. Travelers Insurance MachineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. National Bank of Alaska v. J. B. L. & K. of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Sandpiper North Apartments, Ltd. v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. The Liberty National Bank & Trust Company of Oklahoma City, a National Banking Corporation v. Acme Tool Division of the Rucker CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  4. Smith v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Saulsbury Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API