Legal Opinion

Swift v. McMurray

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 20, 1927No. 17043PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JEFFREY, C.

This was an action by defendant in error, J. F. McMurray against plaintiff in error, George M. Swift, in the district court of Pittsburg county, Okla., for the recovery of certain attorney’s fees alleged to have been earned pursuant to agreement between the parties. Defendant in error will be designated as plaintiff, and plaintiff in error will be designated as defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

The facts so far as will be necessary to present the issues and questions raised by this appeal are as follows: In 1914 defendant, who was then an attorney, entered into a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Producing & Refining Corp. of America v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. First Nat. Bank of Mounds v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Kingfisher Mill & Elev. Co. v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Rider v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Texaco, Inc. v. LaytonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Railway Express Agency v. StephensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. McIntire v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Clanton v. ChrismanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Riser v. HerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API