Legal Opinion

Mead v. Hellams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 11, 1948No. 32919PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

Plaintiff in his petition alleged that on September 25, 1945, he entered into a written contract and agreement with the defendant to do certain described items of repair work upon certain described property belonging to the defendant, for a total sum of $475; that he performed all of the-conditions of the contract and had made demand upon plaintiff for the sum agreed upon and had not been paid; that he filed a proper notice of lien, claim for the services performed and the materials furnished.

Defendant, in her answer, denied the-execution of a written contract and stated that she employed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. State Nat. Bank of Shawnee v. Wood Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Mayor v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Boarman v. Home State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McDonald's Corp. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Edmonds v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Pfrimmer v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Cravens v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. Rogers v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API