Legal Opinion
Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 17, 2004No. 02-3274, 02-3291PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
The parties to this appeal are two insurance companies. Employers Reinsurance Corp. (ERC) and Mid-Continent Casualty Co. (MCCC), a property and casualty in surance company, entered into a Liability Excess Reinsurance Agreement (the Agreement). Under the Agreement ERC reinsured MCCC with respect to certain payments and expenses for which MCCC was responsible to its insureds under policies it issued. In addition, ERC insured MCCC for some extra-contractual liabilities it might incur to its insureds — such as liability for bad faith denial of a claim. Of particular concern…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Wayne Lewis CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Unigard Security Insurance Company, Inc., Successor to Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. v. North River Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- First Bank of Turley v. Fidelity & Deposit Insurance Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Richison v. Ernest Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- ECCLESIASTES 9: 10-11-12, INC. v. LMC Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Cook v. Randolph County, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Valley Forge Insurance v. Health Care Management Partners, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Alexander v. Hardeman (In Re Alexander)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.