United States v. Slack
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
ROBERT E. Quinn, Chief Judge:
We granted the accused’s petition for review of his conviction of wrongful appropriation of an automobile belonging to a civilian to consider the correctness of the following instruction by the law officer in regard to the sentence:
“Normally the maximum punishment will be reserved for ... a case in which there is evidence of a previous conviction involving an offense at least as serious as the one for which the accused is here on trial.”
At trial, the accused did not testify, either before findings or sentence. Evidence of certain pretrial…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. MamaluyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
- United States v. FowleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- United States v. FretwellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
- United States v. StarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. KentU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. MannUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. AlfordU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. KigerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. O'DellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.