United States v. O'Dell
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Quinn, Chief Judge:
At a special court-martial, the accused was represented by counsel who was a nonlawyer in the sense of Article 27, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 827. The court imposed the maximum confinement that can be adjudged by a special court-martial and a bad-conduct discharge, along with partial forfeiture of pay.
A review of the record of the proceedings indicates the accused requested representation by qualified military counsel but no official action was taken on his request. Relying upon United States v Mitchell, 15 USCMA 516, 36 CMR 14, the board…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. ChancelorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- United States v. PrattUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
- United States v. MitchellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. EvansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. AndrewsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
- United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. ThompsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. VelisU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979