Legal Opinion

United States v. O'Dell

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided October 17, 1969No. 22,105PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

At a special court-martial, the accused was represented by counsel who was a nonlawyer in the sense of Article 27, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 827. The court imposed the maximum confinement that can be adjudged by a special court-martial and a bad-conduct discharge, along with partial forfeiture of pay.

A review of the record of the proceedings indicates the accused requested representation by qualified military counsel but no official action was taken on his request. Relying upon United States v Mitchell, 15 USCMA 516, 36 CMR 14, the board…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. ChancelorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  2. United States v. PrattUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  3. United States v. MitchellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  4. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  5. United States v. EvansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. AndrewsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  2. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  3. United States v. ThompsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979
  4. United States v. VelisU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API