United States v. Kiger
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Ferguson, Judge:
This is a case in which The Judge Advocate General of the Navy has certified the decision of the board of review to this Court upon the following question:
“Was the Board of Review correct in deciding that Prosecution Exhibit #4 was not propei'Iy admissible in evidence?”
The issue before us arises out of the receipt in evidence, after announcement of the findings of guilty, of a properly authenticated extract of accused’s service record which recorded the vacation of the suspended portion of the *523adjudged and approved sentence in a previous court-martial. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. CarterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
- United States v. GeibUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. EngleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. WatkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. PrescottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. LockUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
- United States v. BeachUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. WarborgUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- United States v. GrantUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. HuttonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964