Legal Opinion

United States v. Starnes

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 15, 1957No. 10,198PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The accused was convicted of six specifications which alleged either the offering or uttering with intent to defraud of checks which he knew to be falsely made, in violation of Article 123, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 923. Ofir grant of review was limited to the issue of whether the law officer’s reference to paragraphs 76a and 766(3) of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1951, which in turn referred to paragraph 33A prejudiced the accused. We conclude that it did.

After opposing counsel had presented final argument on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. RinehartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  2. United States v. FowleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  3. United States v. EstradaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. HolmesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. WellsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  2. United States v. SlackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  3. United States v. RigneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  4. United States v. KeyesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. SchwartzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API