Legal Opinion
Stewart Development Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 16, 1980No. Civ. 23200PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 409.2 1 the trial court granted the motion of defendants Harry S. and Bart F. Rinker for expungement of a lis pendens upon condition that the Rinkers post an undertaking in the amount of $600,000. Petitioner seeks review by petition for writ of mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 409.4, naming the defendants below, including the Rinkers, as real parties in interest. For convenience, petitioner is referred to as buyer and Harry S. and Bart F. Rinker are referred to as sellers. All statutory references are to the Code…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- United Professional Planning, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Handley v. GuascoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- MacMorris Sales Corp. v. KozakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- BGJ Associates, LLC v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Real Estate Analytics, LLC v. VallasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Peery v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Askari v. R & R LAND CO.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Mason v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.