Legal Opinion

Peery v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1981No. S.F. 24266PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

This case raises again an issue on which we have recently spoken: the proper interpretation of the statutory requirement that a person who prosecutes a real property action pursuant to which he has recorded a notice of lis pendens prove his good faith or suffer expungement of that notice. (Code Civ. Proc., § 409.1, subd. (b).) In Malcolm v. Superior Court (1981) 29 Cal.3d 518 [174 Cal.Rptr. 694, 629 P.2d 495], we recently addressed the problem as it relates to a motion to expunge lis pendens before the trial court has reached a decision on the merits. Here, the issue is raised…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rivcom Corp. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. White v. WensauerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. Ford & Vlahos v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70 v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Greenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API