Peery v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
This case raises again an issue on which we have recently spoken: the proper interpretation of the statutory requirement that a person who prosecutes a real property action pursuant to which he has recorded a notice of lis pendens prove his good faith or suffer expungement of that notice. (Code Civ. Proc., § 409.1, subd. (b).) In Malcolm v. Superior Court (1981) 29 Cal.3d 518 [174 Cal.Rptr. 694, 629 P.2d 495], we recently addressed the problem as it relates to a motion to expunge lis pendens before the trial court has reached a decision on the merits. Here, the issue is raised…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rivcom Corp. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- White v. WensauerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Ford & Vlahos v. ITT Commercial Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70 v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Greenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.