Legal Opinion

United Professional Planning, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1970No. Civ. 10222PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, J.

Pursuant to section 409.4 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, plaintiff petitions for a writ of mandate to command the respondent court to vacate its order expunging plaintiff’s lis pendens. James Goodman and Joseph Goodman, defendants, are the real parties in interest.

Plaintiff sued for specific performance of an alleged contract to convey real property. Motions by defendants for summary judgment and judgment on the pleadings were denied. Thereafter, trial commenced on the merits. At the close of plaintiff’s case, judgment was entered for defendants under section…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. McKay v. Retail Automobile Salesmen's Local Union No. 1067California Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Apostolou v. GenovesiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  2. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. CNA Casualty of California v. Seaboard Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Howard v. Owens CorningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Jarchow v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API