Legal Opinion

Scanlon v. City of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1906No. 5149PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Arapahoe County. Eon. Albert 8. Frost, Judge. M. "W. Scanlon was convicted of violating a liquor ordinance, of the city of Denver, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

From a judgment finding defendant guilty of a violation of an ordinance of the city of Denver, he appeals. The case was tried as a test case upon an agreed statement of facts.

The prosecution was under section 1 of ordinance 102 of the series of 1892, whose title is: “An Ordinance concerning the licensing and regulating of dram shops and tippling houses.” Section 1 reads:

“No person or corporation shall, within the corporate limits of the city of Denver, directly or indirectly, in person or by another, either as principal, agent,, clerk or servant, sell or give away any intoxicating or malt…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McInerney v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  2. Adams v. CroninSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  3. Chipman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  4. Nicrosi v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stanfield ex rel. Stanfield v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Lendholm v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  3. State v. Grays Harbor Commercial Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Golden v. People ex rel. BakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API