McInerney v. City of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
Original Application for Prohibition.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Helm
Petitioner has been a second time found guilty of violating an ordinance prohibiting the keeping open in the city of Denver of dram shops and tippling houses between the hours of 12 o’clock midnight on Saturday, and 5 o’clock A. M. on the following Monday. The police magistrate has overruled an application to set the conviction aside, but, though inti*304mating what his judgment would be, has not yet pronounced the same. This judgment under the ordinance may include both fine and imprisonment. A forfeiture of petitioner’s license to sell liquors, and of the money paid therefor, also follows this…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- In re StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
- Cross v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Waldo v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Ex parte HollwedellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Waller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Canon City v. MerrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- People ex rel. Johnson v. EarlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Crittenden v. Town of BoonevilleMississippi Supreme Court · 1908
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.